Ahh yes those three hated words. The necessary evil to
prevent a single manufacturer from spending large sums of money to create the
perfect race car that then everyone goes and buys to win. Variety is the spice
of life, and BoP keeps the diversity alive.
So I don’t hate the words; I appreciate them. That doesn’t
mean the Balance of Performance is always fair, but the sheer fact that it
exists for a bigger purpose means over the course of a year it does more good
than harm.
In the 2023 season, we experienced more laps not running at
full speed in the last decade. 356 laps of IMSA races were spent behind the
Safety Car. That’s up from last year’s record setting 329 by a considerable
amount. The least, for comparison, was 190 laps in 2020. But the numbers we
examine don’t take this into effect. It’s just something I found interesting.
Ok, so, how are we to calculate the season long Balance of
Performance for the GT3 spec cars? What is a good indicator? Well, I look at
the Fastest Lap from each manufacturer, the best result for each manufacturer,
and the fastest lap from each driver in each car in a race. I also assess how
far off pace each driver was in each race, and compare that not only to the
other people they were up against but to the others driving for the same make.
Since all of the cars in GTD Pro and GTD are run to the same specs, sometimes
the Fastest Lap came from GTD and sometimes it was GTD Pro. Thus, I compared
each driver’s position to the Fastest Lap Overall and in their class. The Time
off Pace is only to the Fast Lap time. Again, because all the cars are the
same, I then sorted each driver with their respective manufacturers and
compared them to their peers. It gave a really clear picture race on race as to
who had speed, who lacked it, and who maybe just didn’t have a strong enough
driver line up to give a realistic purview. For example, most weeks there were
only two drivers representing Corvette and two drivers representing McLaren.
Corvette had two Platinum factory drivers who are both multi-time champions and
hold the record for most podium finishes. McLaren has two drivers who, as
mentioned in a previous article, are very impressive but are both still looking
for their first poles and race wins. It’s not exactly fair to compare their
pace average. Or Porsche, for example, which had more cars than any week in and
week out, yet had only one car with two pro drivers, and more Bronze drivers
competing than any else. That dropped their average significantly, yet they had
more Fastest Laps Overall than anyone else with 3 across the year.
Enough preamble: let’s dive into the numbers.
Acura – 2 Fast Laps (OA Long Beach, GTD PLM), 0 wins, 0
podiums, 1 pole.
Avg FL – 7.45 (Best), Cumulative Avg. FL – 7.45 (4th)
Avg. Finish – 9.73 (Worst), Cumulative Avg. Finish – 9.73 (Worst)
Avg. Time off Pace – 8th,
1.459 sec
Avg. Place in Class – 8th,
21.72. Avg. Place Overall – 8th, 32.77
Strictly speaking, Acura did the least with the most. They
did not have a car run in the Pro class to skew the numbers in a positive
manner at all. They were consistently quick, with two Fastest Laps coming at
Petit Le Mans courtesy of Marcelli and Long Beach from Legge. They were never
in contention for a class win, however. A podium was hopeful at Daytona but a
power steering issue in the dying moments removed them from trophy positions.
Gradient was the only full season entry for the manufacturer, and while they
were out performed speed-wise by Racers Edge in almost every race the latter
ran, they finished better in every round except Petit. Looking at the numbers,
Acura had raw speed, but they never had the performance to put it all together.
Comparing them to the other makes, Acura was never in the top half for Time Off
Pace. Their best performances were Daytona and Long Beach, where they were 6th
for Time Off Pace, and 8 times they were the slowest or next to slowest. Acura
has won Petit Le Mans and the Sahlen’s 6 Hours of the Glen. They’ve won Drivers,
Teams, and Manufacturers championships. The car can do one fast lap. But this
year, it was outclassed.
Aston Martin – 4 Fast Laps (OA Laguna Seca, GTD Pro Lime
Rock & Road America, GTD Daytona), 4 wins (OA GTD Daytona, GTD Pro Lime
Rock & Road America, GTD Lime Rock), 6 podiums, 5 poles (Sorensen Long
Beach, De Angelis CTMP, Gunn Lime Rock, Riberas Road America, James Petit Le
Mans).
Avg. FL –
7.55 (2nd GTD), 3.82 (1st GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. – 5.69
(2nd)
Avg.
Finish – 5 (2nd GTD), 4.3 (5th GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. –
4.65 (3rd)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 4th, 1.082 sec
Avg.
Place in Class – 4th, 14.16.
Avg. Place Overall – 4th, 23.90
In all of the Aston Martin race victories, they were the
fastest car. But they didn’t win every race in which they were the fastest, due
to an error from the pit stand at Laguna Seca. If the Paul Miller BMW hadn’t
been so dominant in GTD, Roman De Angelis would’ve had a second consecutive Driver’s
Championship with a gap in points back to the 96 Turner BMW almost equally as
dominant as Sellers and Snow had over him. Only once all year (at Watkins Glen)
was the 27 not the fastest Aston Martin in the GTD class. They were beaten by
Magnus twice to the checkered flag, however. In Pro, the 23 was by far the
fastest car all year. 7 out of the 11 races saw either Ross Gunn or Alex
Riberas set a lap amongst the top 3 fastest drivers of the class. But their
average finish of 4.3 was the worst of the full season runners. On paper, Aston
Martin had one of the most favorable BoPs of the season. VIR and Indianapolis
were their low points, so we will need to watch closely as to what changes are
made to the BoP for next year to help them competitively at those two tracks.
BMW – 1 Fast Lap (GTD VIR), 5 wins (GTD Sebring, Long Beach,
CTMP, Road America, VIR), 10 podiums, 3 poles (Snow Road America & VIR GTD,
Indy OA).
Avg. FL –
9.18 (3rd GTD), 17 (Last GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. - 13.09 (8th)
Avg.
Finish – 2.36 (Best GTD), 7.7 (Worst GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. – 5.03 (4th)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 6th, 1.234 sec
Avg.
Place in Class – 5th, 18.08.
Avg. Place Overall – 6th, 30.68
BMW did the most with the least. In the 5 victories for Paul
Miller Racing, not once were they the fastest car. Their best race win pace wise
was VIR, where the manufacturer was 3rd in terms of Time off Pace,
Place in Class, and Place Overall. Yes, Foley set the fastest lap of the class,
but he wasn’t in the winning car! BMW was the ONLY manufacturer this year to
not register a Fast Lap Overall. If the average finishes from the GTD Pro car
were removed, BMW would’ve had the best cumulative finish in the class over
Corvette, remarkable considering the 2.36 average finish was in a class frequently
with more than triple the number of cars that ran in GTD Pro, allowing Corvette
to finish with an average of 3.4. It was only at Watkins Glen, VIR, and Petit
Le Mans where BMW featured in the top half of manufacturers for Time Off Pace,
and even then they didn’t break into the top 2. All year they were consistently
mid-pack in terms of pace. And yet BMW walked away with the manufacturer’s
championship for GTD a race early. Next year they’ll have competitive cars in
both versions of GTD for the full season. For 2023, the results outperform the
BoP for BMW, and ultimately that’s what every manufacturer strives to achieve.
Chevrolet – 1 Fast Lap (CTMP OA), 2 wins (CTMP & VIR OA),
6 podiums, 1 pole (Garcia Sebring).
Avg. FL –
5.09 (Best)
Avg. Finish – 3.4 (Best)
Avg. Time off Pace – 0.707, Best
Avg. Place in Class – 1st,
7.17. Avg. Place Overall – 1st, 15.61
First off, we need to remember that Corvette only had one
car this year, and in that car were always factory Platinum rated drivers.
Drivers who have won championships, every major sports car race, the elite. So their
numbers weren’t skewed by any weak links. Only once all year was Corvette not
in the top 3 for Time off Pace, and that was at Petit Le Mans when they had a
relatively early DNF. 8 out of 11 races they were the pace setter in terms of
Time off Pace from their cumulative drivers. Yet they only set the Fast Lap at
CTMP and had the third best average of the GTD Pro class, outperformed by Aston
Martin and Mercedes. By the numbers, Corvette should’ve done better.
Ferrari – 1 Fast Lap (WG OA), 2 podiums, 1 pole (Serra
Watkins Glen).
Avg. FL –
22.25 (Worst GTD), 7.25 (5th GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 14.75 (Worst)
Avg.
Finish – 9.25 (8th GTD), 5.3 (6th GTD Pro), Cumulative
Avg. 7.28 (8th)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 1.781, Worst
Avg.
Place in Class – Worst, 31.95. Avg.
Place Overall – Worst, 53.18
If you look only at the last two lines, you’d think Ferrari
were massive failures. But it’s actually the opposite; they were the best
manufacturer performance and results wise of the endurance only runners in GTD
Pro. Ferrari beat Lamborghini and BMW soundly in finishes and fast laps, earning
podium finishes as well at Watkins Glen and Petit Le Mans. No other interloper
to the full season runners left with a trophy. It is undeniable that with the
new car, the pace wasn’t there for Ferrari. Daniel Serra was always the fastest
driver for the make in Pro, including the Fast Lap at Watkins Glen, but the growing
pains of the car at Daytona (its debut, let’s not forget) and Sebring hurt it’s
season average badly. In GTD, there was speed in the car at Watkins for Alessio
Rovera, but not even Antonio Fuoco could break into the top 10 at Petit. The
Ferraris, with the sole exception of Risi, always had a weak link driver, so
that did skew the numbers down. However, the car ran in it’s best scheme at
Watkins Glen, so let’s see how close to that BoP it is when we get to January.
Lamborghini – 2 Fast Laps (PLM OA, WG GTD), 1 win (PLM), 2
podiums, 1 pole (Spinelli WG).
Avg. FL –
11.09 (6th GTD), 8.5 (7th GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 9.8 (7th)
Avg.
Finish – 7.27 (5th GTD), 6.5 (7th GTD Pro), Cumulative
Avg. 6.89 (7th)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 1.211, 5th
Avg.
Place in Class – 6th, 19.57. Avg. Place Overall – 5th, 30.67
To me, Lamborghini feels a bit like Acura. It’s a
manufacturer that’s won the GTD championship before. They’ve won major races
(Daytona, Sebring, Petit), and yet there’s just something missing. This year, Petit
was their race to win. They, and Mercedes but we’ll get to them later, had the
best BoP. They were also super strong at Indy, Road America, Lime Rock, and
Watkins. Let’s look at Petit for example. There were 9 drivers for Lamborghini,
and 5 of them were faster than the best driver from the championship winning
Lexus. This year it was largely Forte Racing representing Lamborghini alone,
and they got a win in their first season of GTD. But looking strictly at the
numbers, they should’ve had stronger races at Watkins, Lime Rock, and Road
America. That they didn’t make a podium appearance until the penultimate race
of the season tells the tale of how Lamborghini was a bit disappointing in
2023. Coming off a major win, they should have no excuses for lack of results
in 2024.
Lexus – 1 Fast Lap (VIR OA), 3 wins (Long Beach and Watkins
Glen Overall, Watkins Glen GTD), 11 podiums, 4 poles (Hawksworth Long Beach,
CTMP, VIR, PLM).
Avg. FL –
12.36 (7th GTD), 6.27 (4th GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 9.32
(6th)
Avg.
Finish – 7.82 (6th GTD), 2.7 (Best GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 5.26 (6th)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 0.944, 2nd
Avg.
Place in Class – 2nd, 12.35. Avg. Place Overall – 2nd,
22.18
After 8 years of running in the GT3 spec class, Lexus
finally won their manufacturer’s championship! They also got the win at the
Sahlen’s 6 Hours of the Glen, meaning they’ve now won 2 of the 4 major
endurance races. Lexus is a two car team, a two car effort, with only one true
am driver, so these numbers are very interesting to me. Laguna Seca and Road
America were the only two races where Lexus wasn’t in the top half of manufactures
for BoP. In both the Pro and the Am car, all 3 drivers (endurance included)
took turns being the fastest driver of the car. Both cars struggled at Road
America, Daytona, and Sebring with mechanical issues and crashes taking both
cars out at Petit. But did they capitalize when they had the stars align? Oh
yes, yes they did. Telitz was untouchable in the final stint at the Glen,
running away from his sister car even. They swept the classes that race. Their
other victory, Long Beach, was a pole to flag win for the 14, with Telitz,
Barnicoat and Hawksworth all within .26 of the Fastest lap set by Legge. Those
three made up half of the top 6 fastest drivers in the race. So should they
have won more races? By the numbers, no. They should’ve been more competitive at
VIR, where they were faster than the GTD winning BMW but not faster than the
race winning Corvette. We don’t have accurate reads on Petit, due to reasons
mentioned above, and also Laguna Seca, where Telitz was out early in his stint.
Per the numbers, Lexus won the GTD Pro championship through consistency and a lack
thereof shown by the competition.
McLaren – 2 Fast Laps (Road America OA, CTMP GTD), 0 wins, 3
podiums, 0 poles.
Avg FL – 14.27 (8th), Cumulative Avg. FL – 14.27 (9th)
Avg. Finish – 8.36 (7th), Cumulative Avg. Finish – 8.36 (9th)
Avg. Time off Pace – 7th,
1.307
Avg. Place in Class – 7th,
21.22. Avg. Place Overall – 7th, 32.46
McLaren, as noted above, is the anti-Corvette. With only one
pro driver in the car, this manufacturer has the most skewed numbers. The DNF
at Petit, when only the Bronze had driven the car, massively threw off the
numbers for the year as well. That said, Iribe was the strongest Bronze of the season,
and McLaren did impress speed-wise in many, many races in 2023. The averages
are thrown off terribly by Sebring (FL only 26th), Watkins (damage
in Iribe’s stint early on led to only 28th), Lime Rock (Schandorff
started on used tires and Iribe crashed early, best 20th), Indy
(damage early in Schandorff’s stint after contact with the 12 Lexus, best only
12th) and of course the DNF at Petit (best Iribe 44th).
Take those performances out and all of a sudden their average Fast Lap goes to
4.5, which would be third best of the year and ahead of the Corvette! Misfortune
was the name of the game for McLaren. Schandorff was either fastest or second
fastest at Long Beach, CTMP, and Road America, and he was the third quickest
driver at VIR. All those races, by the way, were won by the Paul Miller BMW,
where Schandorff was quicker than either of the winning drivers. The BoP,
therefore, was in the McLaren’s favor. It’s just luck that wasn’t.
Mercedes-AMG – 4 Fast Laps (Daytona & Sebring OA,
Sebring GTD Pro, Indy GTD), 5 wins (Daytona & Laguna Seca GTD Pro, Indy &
Petit OA, Indy GTD), 10 podiums, 3 poles (Engel Daytona, Ellis Daytona, Skeen
Lime Rock).
Avg. FL – 9.55 (4th
GTD), 4.45 (2nd GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 7.00 (3rd)
Avg.
Finish – 7.09 (4th GTD), 3.1 (2nd GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg.
5.10 (5th)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 1.059, 3rd
Avg.
Place in Class – 3rd, 13.74. Avg. Place Overall – 3rd,
22.89
Mercedes capitalized in GTD Pro. They won when fastest at
Daytona and Petit when they were 2nd fastest, just barely off the
Lambo but still miles ahead of everyone else. They also capitalized on other’s
misfortunes. They were the second slowest at Indy, when they got the double
victory (but Ellis was the fastest in GTD so we can’t read too much into the
lack of speed from the pro car). As a matter of fact, if you remove the weakest
driver from the entire race who happened to be in a Mercedes, the performance from
the make goes to the second strongest. They very much felt like they benefited
from all others’ misfortune at Laguna Seca when that victory appeared. By the
numbers, they should’ve won Sebring too, but the cautions at the end of that
race opened it up to strategy playing a wonderful and surprising role. They
were fast enough at CTMP but had the contact with the Aston Martin. Ultimately,
the GTD Pro Mercedes did all it could with all it was given! Their worst races
were Long Beach, Watkins Glen and Lime Rock performance wise, yet they also
finished last at Road America and VIR. Could they have beaten the 14 Lexus?
Possibly. But could they have done more with what they had? Unlikely.
GTD is a different story. Luca Stolz was the second fastest driver in
GTD at Daytona. Grenier had the Fast Lap at Sebring while Ellis had it at Indy.
Yet the manufacturer had as many podiums in GTD as it had wins in GTD Pro. They
should have won Daytona, Sebring, and been a more serious threat to the
Lamborghini at Petit.
Looking at the picture overall, Mercedes was in the top 3 of
Time off Pace 3 times all year, but it in the bottom 3 five times. In almost
every race, all Mercedes drivers were separated by at most a second and a half.
That’s excellent, considering the strength of the pros. Mercedes overdelivered
in GTD Pro but left a lot on the table in GTD. I’m expecting more trophies in
2024.
Porsche – 4 Fast Laps (Lime Rock and Indy OA, Long Beach GTD
Pro, Laguna Seca GTD), 2 wins (Sebring & Laguna Seca OA), 14 podiums, 3
poles (Bachler Laguna Seca OA, Indy GTD Pro, Udell Laguna Seca).
Avg. FL – 10.73 (5th
GTD), 7.73 (6th GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg. 9.23 (5th)
Avg.
Finish – 5.36 (3rd GTD), 3.2 (3rd GTD Pro), Cumulative Avg.
4.28 (2nd)
Avg.
Time off Pace – 1.664, 9th
Avg.
Place in Class – 9th, 23.49. Avg. Place Overall –9th, 36.91
Oh Porsche. Bottom of the chart for Time off Pace at
Daytona, Long Beach, Watkins Glen, CTMP, Road America, and VIR. They got the
help they wanted for Laguna Seca and seriously capitalized, getting both pole
positions, winning the race in GTD while claiming the Fast Lap with the car
that finished in 3rd. More podiums earned than any other
manufacturer, but it also needs to be said more cars entered week in and week
out. Every car took a turn as the fastest of the race and best finishing. That’s
the good, but we also need to look at the not so good. Taking the Pro car, they
finished 6th in terms of Fast Lap average in a class with 5 cars.
Their average finish was good enough for 3rd, yet they finished 4th
in the championship. They were the only full season manufacturer in GTD Pro to win
just once. That win came in a race where they were 5th on Time off
Pace, so you can’t credit the strength of the car for the victory. That honor
goes to strategy and the team. The win at Laguna for the KellyMoss Porsche does
go to pace. They were the 2nd fastest car in average Time off Pace,
and 1st for Overall. At Lime Rock the Porsches were fast, but
suffered a strange mechanical issue with the right front bodywork that reared
its head on most of the cars. Indy also saw a lot of speed from Porsche, at least
the Pfaff car, but a penalty for improper start procedure effectively took them
out of the running off the bat. At Long Beach, Pilet was flying, but it wasn’t
enough to catch either the Lexus or Corvette ahead. Ultimately, Porsche had
more bullets in the gun this year than anyone, so they should’ve gotten the
most podiums. But they also had more weak drivers, with each of the GTD cars
running a Bronze for the majority of the races. Of their podiums, 9 of them
were earned when there wasn’t a Bronze as part of the driving line up. Could
Porsche have done better? Well, their worst finishes in GTD were Daytona (no), Long
Beach (no), CTMP (arguably, Hindman was the 7th quickest driver),
and Road America (yes, Priaulx was P2). They were 1st or 2nd
speed-wise in GTD at Laguna Seca, Watkins Glen, CTMP, and Indy, yet only had
the Laguna win. Porsche is always well represented in IMSA, and if they have as
many teams wearing the Stuttgart crest in 2024 they should get a lot more than
just the one victory.
After writing all this, I got a bit curious. What would
everything look like if you take the numbers from simply the fastest driver
from each car from each race? This does change the results!
Aston Martin is strongest across the board. Average FL
Overall is 6, Place in Class 3.36, and Time off Pace 4.08. Mercedes is second
across the board, but Corvette drops to third. Lexus is fourth, and Porsche
vaults all the way up to 5th! BMW, GTD champions let’s not forget, are
the third slowest car on pace, and next to last for Overall and Place in Class.
McLaren still registers last due to Watkins, Lime Rock and Petit. Remove them,
and you all of a sudden get a Time off Pace good enough for 2nd!
There’s no way to avoid the impact of drivers on car performance,
but as shown above, having multiple drivers ringing the neck of similar cars
does lead to better data! Do we have a good baseline going in to 2024? Yes.
With no new cars, we should have a much better understanding of where people
need help and when, and how to give it to them. Ultimately, the Balance of
Performance for the GTD classes in 2023 led to some of the best racing
globally. Like it or loath it, you have to appreciate that 7 out of the 10
manufacturers found victory this season. Let’s see if we can beat that number
in 2024!
Charts:
Fast Laps
|
OA
|
Class
|
|
Daytona
|
Gounon
|
Sorensen
|
|
Sebring
|
Grenier
|
Engel
|
|
LB
|
Legge
|
Pilet
|
|
LS
|
Gunn
|
Andlauer
|
|
WG6
|
Serra
|
Spinelli
|
|
CTMP
|
Garcia
|
Schandorff
|
|
LR
|
Andlauer
|
Riberas
|
|
RAm
|
Schandorff
|
Gunn
|
|
VIR
|
Barnicoat
|
Foley
|
|
Indy
|
Pilet
|
Ellis
|
|
PLM
|
Bortolotti
|
Marcelli
|
Finishes & Fast Laps
|
Manu
|
Finish
|
|
Manu
|
FL
|
Fast Laps
|
|
|
BMW
|
2.36
|
|
Acura
|
7.45
|
LB
|
PLM
|
|
|
Aston
|
5
|
|
Aston
|
7.55
|
D24
|
|
|
|
Porsche
|
5.36
|
|
BMW
|
9.18
|
VIR
|
|
|
|
Merc
|
7.09
|
|
Merc
|
9.55
|
S12
|
Indy
|
|
|
Lambo
|
7.27
|
|
Porsche
|
10.73
|
LS
|
LR
|
|
|
Lexus
|
7.82
|
|
Lambo
|
11.09
|
WG
|
|
|
|
McLaren
|
8.36
|
|
Lexus
|
12.36
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrari
|
9.25
|
|
McLaren
|
14.27
|
CTMP
|
RAm
|
|
|
Acura
|
9.73
|
|
Ferrari
|
22.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro
|
Finish
|
|
Pro
|
FL
|
Fast Laps
|
|
|
Lexus
|
2.7
|
|
Aston
|
3.82
|
LS
|
LR
|
RAm
|
|
Merc
|
3.1
|
|
Merc
|
4.45
|
D24
|
S12
|
|
|
Porsche
|
3.2
|
|
Corvette
|
5.09
|
CTMP
|
|
|
|
Corvette
|
3.4
|
|
Lexus
|
6.27
|
VIR
|
|
|
|
Aston
|
4.3
|
|
Ferrari
|
7.25
|
WG
|
|
|
|
Ferrari
|
5.3
|
|
Porsche
|
7.73
|
LB
|
Indy
|
|
|
Lambo
|
6.5
|
|
Lambo
|
8.5
|
PLM
|
|
|
|
BMW
|
7.7
|
|
BMW
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Average
Finish
|
Cumulative Average FL
|
|
|
|
Corvette
|
3.40
|
|
Corvette
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
|
Porsche
|
4.28
|
|
Aston
|
5.69
|
|
|
|
|
Aston
|
4.65
|
|
Merc
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
|
BMW
|
5.03
|
|
Acura
|
7.45
|
|
|
|
|
Merc
|
5.10
|
|
Porsche
|
9.23
|
|
|
|
|
Lexus
|
5.26
|
|
Lexus
|
9.32
|
|
|
|
|
Lambo
|
6.89
|
|
Lambo
|
9.80
|
|
|
|
|
Ferrari
|
7.28
|
|
BMW
|
13.09
|
|
|
|
|
McLaren
|
8.36
|
|
McLaren
|
14.27
|
|
|
|
|
Acura
|
9.73
|
|
Ferrari
|
14.75
|
|
|
|
Race Winner Performances
Best Driver Performances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manu
|
ToP
|
|
Manu
|
OA
|
|
Manu
|
PIC
|
|
|
Aston
|
0.408
|
|
Aston
|
6.00
|
|
Aston
|
3.36
|
|
|
Merc
|
0.495
|
|
Merc
|
8.27
|
|
Merc
|
4.64
|
|
|
Corvette
|
0.522
|
|
Corvette
|
10.27
|
|
Corvette
|
5.09
|
|
|
Lexus
|
0.551
|
|
Lexus
|
12.36
|
|
Lexus
|
6.09
|
|
|
Porsche
|
0.624
|
|
Porsche
|
14.00
|
|
Porsche
|
6.64
|
|
|
Ferrari
|
0.657
|
|
Acura
|
14.73
|
|
Ferrari
|
7.25
|
|
|
Lambo
|
0.687
|
|
Lambo
|
14.82
|
|
Lambo
|
7.82
|
|
|
BMW
|
0.702
|
|
Ferrari
|
15.75
|
|
Acura
|
8.27
|
|
|
Acura
|
0.749
|
|
BMW
|
16.82
|
|
BMW
|
9.18
|
|
|
McLaren
|
0.828
|
|
McLaren
|
23.09
|
|
McLaren
|
14.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
